Site FAQ page
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:22 am
Site FAQ page
You should add question about Multiplayer and plans on it to the FAQ page. I still didn't understood can I play with other players or not.
-
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:18 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
Yeah a blurb on that wouldn't hurt.
It's only singleplayer and likely to only ever be singleplayer.
It's only singleplayer and likely to only ever be singleplayer.
- Matthew
- Site Admin
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:31 am
Re: Site FAQ page
icepick is correct, there are no plans to add multiplayer. I've updated the FAQ to include the question.
Matthew Davis, Subset Games Developer - If you're looking for tech support, you'll get help faster emailing directly, contact info here
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
yeah
they can't make it not burn down CPUs
setting it up so you could save your ships and then battle against your friends would be unthinkable
as in the devs are too stupid to finger out that this game will die before they finish it unless they add features to increase replay value;
like saving ships, an endless enemy wave mode, and mutiplayer
Is making a decent game too hard for you? maybe you should call it quits and sell the game to a firm with real talent
they can't make it not burn down CPUs
setting it up so you could save your ships and then battle against your friends would be unthinkable
as in the devs are too stupid to finger out that this game will die before they finish it unless they add features to increase replay value;
like saving ships, an endless enemy wave mode, and mutiplayer
Is making a decent game too hard for you? maybe you should call it quits and sell the game to a firm with real talent
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:48 am
Re: Site FAQ page
I don't normally wish to engage in this kind of flaming, but nfia2, seriously, these guys have totally crafted a good game.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:23 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
Too bad, so sad for you all of the points I make are correctgreatimposter wrote:I don't normally wish to engage in this kind of flaming, but nfia2, seriously, these guys have totally crafted a good game.
I know more about programming and games then enyone else on here and I've played the game more than these idiots
unlock the crystal ship before saying that it is easy
die over and over due to stupid shit before saying the game doesn't need to be fixed
seriously
play the fuking game and acccept that the only challenege comes from being randomly dicked around
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:12 am
Re: Site FAQ page
Well, English is not my native language and even i can tell that you have serious grammar and spelling problems man...nfiea2 wrote:Too bad, so sad for you all of the points I make are correctgreatimposter wrote:I don't normally wish to engage in this kind of flaming, but nfia2, seriously, these guys have totally crafted a good game.
I know more about programming and games then enyone else on here and I've played the game more than these idiots
unlock the crystal ship before saying that it is easy
die over and over due to stupid shit before saying the game doesn't need to be fixed
seriously
play the fuking game and acccept that the only challenege comes from being randomly dicked around
This game is very VERY good, and you saying "shits" like you are best programmer here will not change this fact.
So calm down... and shut up... if you can't say something helpful or intelligent

But thruth is that Multiplayer should be included in game because this game is almost like MADE for multiplayer...!!!
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:35 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
Holy shit a coop game of FTL would be the best possible experience EVER.
And some PVP action where you have limited scrap to buy stuff for your ship, and then engage in head-to-head battle.
Oh this would be epic.
Only concern would be pausing in PVP. I think some kind of chess timer, where you have several seconds of pause and gain new seconds every now and then.
And some PVP action where you have limited scrap to buy stuff for your ship, and then engage in head-to-head battle.
Oh this would be epic.
Only concern would be pausing in PVP. I think some kind of chess timer, where you have several seconds of pause and gain new seconds every now and then.
-
- Posts: 230
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:55 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
I disagree - everything about how the game is designed, from the ground up, seems to be geared towards single player, not multiplayer. The entire game would play drastically differently if you couldn't pause, and there's no way to have synchronized pausing in a multiplayer game.Hallker wrote:But thruth is that Multiplayer should be included in game because this game is almost like MADE for multiplayer...!!!
-
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:42 pm
Re: Site FAQ page
There is a way, but the gameplay would be very different.
Do you know Laser Squad Nemesis (images, videos)? It is (or rather was) an indie game by the authors of the original XCOM games. It managed to combine action planning, a real-time feel, and let the two players each prepare their turn.
How it worked was that each player would have all the time they wanted to prepare their orders for the next 10 seconds of combat. As in XCOM, each action had a cost (in fractions of seconds). The game would help the player simulate how the enemy could react, so the core of the game was giving orders, "playing" the action, seeing how it went, possibly altering orders, "playing" again, thinking about what your adversary would think you would think he would do
, what units he possibly had outside of your field of view, and ultimately sending the order list to a server (which is now down, though fans have hacked a replacement). Your opponent would do the same, and when the two order lists were received by the server, it would resolve both sets of orders, and send the results back to the players, who could visualize how things really went, and were now ready to plan and simulate the next ten seconds.
The end results worked surprisingly well. Especially replaying the whole skirmish at the end of the game had a very natural, action feel, and yet the players had had all the time in the world to think it through.
The downside is that you had to wait for your opponent to send his or her orders. In some cases it went rather fast, in other cases you had to wait for hours, or even until the following day. This worked fine in a game where the whole purpose was to simulate skirmishes, but would alter FTL dramatically.
Do you know Laser Squad Nemesis (images, videos)? It is (or rather was) an indie game by the authors of the original XCOM games. It managed to combine action planning, a real-time feel, and let the two players each prepare their turn.
How it worked was that each player would have all the time they wanted to prepare their orders for the next 10 seconds of combat. As in XCOM, each action had a cost (in fractions of seconds). The game would help the player simulate how the enemy could react, so the core of the game was giving orders, "playing" the action, seeing how it went, possibly altering orders, "playing" again, thinking about what your adversary would think you would think he would do

The end results worked surprisingly well. Especially replaying the whole skirmish at the end of the game had a very natural, action feel, and yet the players had had all the time in the world to think it through.
The downside is that you had to wait for your opponent to send his or her orders. In some cases it went rather fast, in other cases you had to wait for hours, or even until the following day. This worked fine in a game where the whole purpose was to simulate skirmishes, but would alter FTL dramatically.
Forum janitor — If you spot spam, PM me the URL and/or the username of the spammer.
I have powers, moderator powers. I am not keen on using them, but will do so if needed.
I have powers, moderator powers. I am not keen on using them, but will do so if needed.